top of page

Eduovisual

Gastrointestinal

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: Lynch and FAP

Clinical Overview and When to Suspect Hereditary Colorectal Cancer

— Autosomal dominant defect in DNA mismatch repair (MMR): MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM deletion silencing MSH2

— Causes microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors

— Lifetime CRC risk 20–80%; mean age at diagnosis ~45; right-sided predominance, mucinous/poorly differentiated histology, often synchronous/metachronous cancers

— Extracolonic risks: endometrial (highest in women, ~40–60%), ovarian, gastric, small bowel, urothelial (ureter/renal pelvis), pancreatobiliary, brain (Turcot variant with glioblastoma), sebaceous neoplasms (Muir-Torre)

— Autosomal dominant APC gene mutation (chromosome 5q21)

Hundreds to thousands of adenomas by adolescence; 100% CRC risk by age ~40 if untreated

— Attenuated FAP (AFAP): <100 polyps, later onset (~50s), still high lifetime risk

— Extracolonic: duodenal/periampullary adenomas, gastric fundic gland polyps, desmoid tumors, osteomas, CHRPE (congenital hypertrophy of retinal pigment epithelium), thyroid (papillary), hepatoblastoma in children, medulloblastoma (Turcot)

— Patient <50 with CRC, or any CRC with MSI-H/dMMR on tumor testing

Multiple primary cancers in one patient (CRC + endometrial)

— Strong family history meeting Amsterdam II (3 relatives, 2 generations, 1 <50) or revised Bethesda criteria

— Florid polyposis on screening colonoscopy

Board pearl: Universal tumor MMR/MSI testing is now recommended on every newly diagnosed CRC regardless of age — a key Step 3 systems-based practice point that drives downstream germline testing and cascade screening of relatives.

Hereditary CRC syndromes account for ~5% of all colorectal cancers; the two dominant Step 3 entities are Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
Lynch syndrome
FAP
When to suspect on Step 3
Solid White Background
Presentation Patterns and Key History

— Healthy 40-something with iron-deficiency anemia, hematochezia, or change in bowel habits → colonoscopy reveals right-sided CRC

— Woman in her 40s–50s with postmenopausal or abnormal uterine bleeding found to have endometrial cancer; family history reveals colon cancers — endometrial is often the sentinel cancer in Lynch women

— Personal history of two Lynch-spectrum cancers (e.g., colon at 42, ureteral at 55)

— Family pedigree: multiple relatives across ≥2 generations with CRC/endometrial/ovarian/gastric/urothelial cancers

— Adolescent or young adult with hematochezia, anemia, abdominal pain, or incidentally found polyps; sibling/parent with known FAP

— Asymptomatic teen referred for screening because a parent carries APC mutation

— Adult with desmoid tumor of mesentery or abdominal wall, especially post-laparotomy

— Child with hepatoblastoma (rare but classic association)

Three-generation pedigree: ages of cancer diagnosis, tumor types, ethnicity (Ashkenazi Jewish → I1307K APC variant)

— Prior polyp counts and pathology

— Symptoms of extracolonic disease: hematuria (urothelial), bleeding (gastric/duodenal), neuro symptoms (Turcot)

— Reproductive history in women — endometrial/ovarian screening implications

Aspirin/NSAID use (CAPP2 trial: aspirin reduces Lynch CRC)

Key distinction: Lynch tumors arise from few but rapidly progressing adenomas via accelerated carcinogenesis (3–5 yr adenoma-to-cancer, vs 10 yr sporadic), whereas FAP produces an overwhelming polyp burden where the issue is sheer numbers, not speed. This explains why Lynch screening intervals are short (1–2 yr) despite "normal-looking" colons, while FAP demands eventual colectomy because endoscopic control becomes impossible.

Lynch syndrome presentations
FAP presentations
Targeted history elements
Solid White Background
Physical Exam Findings and Extraintestinal Stigmata

— Exam is usually unremarkable; this is a "pedigree disease"

Muir-Torre variant: sebaceous adenomas, sebaceous carcinomas, keratoacanthomas — palpable yellowish facial/trunk papules

— Café-au-lait macules and hematologic malignancies in constitutional MMR deficiency (CMMRD), biallelic — pediatric presentation

— Abdominal exam: occasionally a right-sided mass; rectal exam typically normal

Congenital hypertrophy of retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) — pigmented fundus lesions on dilated eye exam; bilateral/multiple lesions are highly suggestive

Osteomas: bony hard masses on mandible, skull, long bones — palpable

Epidermoid/sebaceous cysts on skin, often before puberty

Supernumerary or unerupted teeth, odontomas on dental panoramic film

Desmoid tumors: firm, fixed abdominal wall or mesenteric masses, often post-surgical

Gardner syndrome = FAP + osteomas + soft tissue tumors + dental anomalies (modern classification: all part of FAP spectrum)

Turcot syndrome: FAP or Lynch + CNS tumor (medulloblastoma with APC; glioblastoma with MMR)

— Thyroid exam: cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid cancer — young women with FAP, palpable nodule

— Tachycardia, orthostasis from chronic GI blood loss

— Cachexia, supraclavicular adenopathy (Virchow), umbilical nodule (Sister Mary Joseph) in advanced disease

— Hepatomegaly/ascites suggest metastatic spread

Board pearl: A young adult with mandibular osteoma + epidermoid cyst + hundreds of colon polyps is the classic Gardner/FAP triad — recognize and proceed to APC germline testing plus colonoscopic confirmation. Always do a dilated eye exam looking for CHRPE in suspected FAP probands — cheap, specific, and exam-favored.

Lynch syndrome
FAP
Hemodynamic/abdominal assessment in symptomatic CRC
Solid White Background
Diagnostic Workup — Initial Labs, Tumor Testing, and Imaging

— CBC (iron-deficiency anemia), CMP (LFTs for hepatic mets), CEA as baseline tumor marker (not for screening)

— Iron studies, ferritin

— Coags if planning procedures

Universal screening of every newly diagnosed CRC (and endometrial cancer) with either:

IHC for MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) — loss of staining indicates dMMR

MSI testing by PCR/NGS — MSI-H pattern

— If MLH1 loss on IHC → reflex to BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation

— Positive BRAF/methylation → likely sporadic MSI tumor (no Lynch)

— Negative → proceed to germline MMR gene testing

MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 loss → go directly to germline testing (BRAF/methylation not informative)

— Contrast CT chest/abdomen/pelvis for CRC staging

— Pelvic MRI for rectal cancers

— PET selectively

— Lynch: typically few polyps, right-sided cancer, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, mucinous/signet ring/medullary histology, Crohn-like reaction

— FAP: carpet of >100 adenomas; AFAP: 10–100, right-sided predominance

— Multigene panel (APC, MUTYH, MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2/EPCAM, plus polyposis genes)

Pre- and post-test genetic counseling required — Step 3 ethics/systems point

Step 3 management: When a 38-year-old has right-sided CRC with IHC showing loss of MSH2/MSH6, the next best step is germline MMR gene testing with genetic counseling — not BRAF testing (that's only useful when MLH1 is lost). Recognize this branch point.

Initial labs in any suspected CRC
Tumor tissue testing — the Step 3 anchor for Lynch
Imaging for staging
Colonoscopy findings supporting syndromes
Germline genetic testing
Solid White Background
Advanced/Confirmatory Studies and Diagnostic Criteria

— Blood or buccal sample for next-generation sequencing panel covering APC, MUTYH (biallelic = MUTYH-associated polyposis), MMR genes, EPCAM, plus emerging genes (POLE, POLD1, NTHL1)

Cascade testing: once a pathogenic variant is identified in proband, first-degree relatives offered targeted single-site testing

— Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) should not drive clinical action — manage by phenotype

Amsterdam II for Lynch (3-2-1 rule): ≥3 relatives with Lynch-associated cancer, spanning ≥2 generations, ≥1 diagnosed <50, one a first-degree relative of the other two, FAP excluded, tumors verified

Revised Bethesda guidelines: triggers for tumor MSI testing — CRC <50, synchronous/metachronous Lynch tumors, MSI histology <60, family history

— Modern practice: universal tumor testing has largely replaced Bethesda

— Clinical: >100 colorectal adenomas or fewer adenomas with APC mutation/family history

— AFAP: 10–99 adenomas, often right-sided, later onset

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP): autosomal recessive, biallelic MUTYH mutations, 10–100 polyps, mimics AFAP — test MUTYH if APC negative

— Upper endoscopy with side-viewing duodenoscope for Spigelman staging of duodenal polyposis in FAP

— Capsule/CT enterography for small bowel in Lynch

— Transvaginal ultrasound + endometrial biopsy considered for Lynch women

Board pearl: A patient with 20 colonic adenomas, negative APC, autosomal recessive family pattern points to MUTYH-associated polyposis — confirm with biallelic MUTYH testing. Don't anchor on FAP just because there are polyps.

Germline testing logistics
Clinical diagnostic criteria — still tested
FAP diagnosis
Endoscopic surveillance studies in known carriers
Solid White Background
Risk Stratification and Management Logic

Colonoscopy every 1–2 years starting age 20–25 (or 2–5 yr before earliest family CRC)

— Polypectomy of all adenomas; subtotal/total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis considered if cancer develops or polyps unmanageable, balanced against quality of life

Endometrial/ovarian: discuss risk-reducing hysterectomy + BSO after childbearing complete (~age 40), especially MLH1/MSH2/EPCAM carriers

— Annual urinalysis from age 30–35 (MSH2 carriers especially) for urothelial cancer

— EGD with duodenal exam every 3–5 yr from age 40

Daily aspirin (CAPP2 trial): 600 mg/day reduced Lynch CRC; current practice uses lower dose (~100 mg) — discuss as chemoprevention

Annual flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy starting age 10–15 in known carriers

Prophylactic colectomy when polyp burden becomes unmanageable or high-grade dysplasia/cancer appears — typically late teens to early 20s

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) if dense rectal polyposis

Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) if rectum sparing — easier QOL, but requires lifelong rectal surveillance every 6–12 mo

— Upper endoscopy every 1–4 yr by Spigelman stage starting age 20–25

— Annual thyroid ultrasound from late teens

— Abdominal exam/imaging for desmoids

Step 3 management: A 19-year-old FAP carrier with >1000 adenomas and high-grade dysplasia in the rectum should undergo total proctocolectomy with IPAA, not endoscopic management — the next best step is surgical referral, not "repeat colonoscopy in 6 months."

Risk stratification drives surgical timing and surveillance intervals
Lynch syndrome management framework
FAP management framework
AFAP/MAP: colonoscopy every 1–2 yr starting age 18–20; colectomy if uncontrollable
Solid White Background
Pharmacotherapy and Chemoprevention

CAPP2 trial: 600 mg daily for ≥2 years reduced CRC incidence by ~50% over 10-yr follow-up

— Current guidance: consider daily aspirin (typical 75–325 mg) in Lynch carriers, individualized for bleeding risk

— Discuss as shared decision-making — not yet universally mandated

Sulindac and celecoxib historically shrink adenomas; do not replace colectomy

— Adjunctive role: control rectal polyps after IRA, manage duodenal polyposis, control desmoid tumors

— Celecoxib FDA approval for FAP was withdrawn; sulindac still used off-label

— Monitor for GI bleeding, renal injury, cardiovascular risk

— First-line for symptomatic/progressive desmoids: sulindac ± tamoxifen/toremifene

— Refractory: tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib), low-dose chemotherapy (methotrexate + vinblastine), or nirogacestat (gamma-secretase inhibitor, newer)

— Surgery often avoided — desmoids recur and worsen with trauma

— Stage II MSI-H tumors: do NOT benefit from 5-FU monotherapy — generally observe

— Stage III/IV: standard FOLFOX, plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab ± ipilimumab) are highly effective in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic CRC — frontline pembrolizumab is now standard

— Combined OCPs and progestin IUDs reduce endometrial cancer risk in Lynch women

Board pearl: A patient with metastatic CRC and dMMR/MSI-H tumor — first-line systemic therapy is pembrolizumab, not FOLFOX. This is a high-yield Step 3/oncology integration point reflecting current NCCN/FDA guidance.

Aspirin in Lynch syndrome
NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors in FAP
Desmoid tumor pharmacotherapy
Adjuvant therapy for Lynch-associated CRC
Endometrial cancer prevention
Solid White Background
Procedures and Surgical Management

Segmental colectomy vs extended (subtotal) colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis — extended resection reduces metachronous CRC risk but with more bowel-function impact

Shared decision-making considering age, function, fertility, surveillance feasibility

— Rectal cancer in Lynch: proctectomy + total abdominal colectomy (or proctocolectomy) often favored over isolated proctectomy

— Women: concomitant prophylactic hysterectomy + BSO if post-childbearing

Total proctocolectomy with IPAA: gold standard when rectal polyposis is dense; eliminates CRC risk in colon/rectum but pouch surveillance still required (pouch adenomas develop)

Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA): preserved rectum allows better continence/fertility but lifetime rectal surveillance every 6–12 mo; eventual completion proctectomy if rectum becomes unmanageable

Timing: usually late teens / once polyp burden unmanageable, before cancer develops

Spigelman staging: number, size, histology, dysplasia of duodenal polyps

— Stage IV or high-grade dysplasia → pancreas-sparing duodenectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy

— Endoscopic ampullectomy for focal lesions

— Generally avoided — high recurrence, may worsen disease — except life-threatening obstruction

— High-definition white light + chromoendoscopy improves polyp detection in Lynch

CCS pearl: For a 22-year-old FAP patient admitted preoperatively for proctocolectomy, your CCS order set should include NPO, bowel prep, type & screen, IV access, DVT prophylaxis, smoking cessation counseling, stoma marking by enterostomal therapist, genetic counseling for siblings, preoperative EGD with Spigelman assessment, and multidisciplinary surgical/genetics consults.

Lynch syndrome surgical decisions when CRC develops
FAP surgical decisions
Duodenal/ampullary management (FAP)
Desmoid surgery
Endoscopic surveillance
Solid White Background
Special Populations — Elderly, Renal, and Hepatic Impairment

— Index diagnosis of Lynch in a 70-year-old still triggers cascade testing of younger relatives — the proband may have minimal personal benefit but enormous family value

— Surveillance intensity individualized to life expectancy, functional status, comorbidities — a frail 82-year-old with multiple comorbidities may not benefit from aggressive 1-yr colonoscopy intervals

— Risk-reducing hysterectomy/BSO is typically irrelevant after natural menopause but consider if endometrial polyps/abnormal bleeding

— Discuss aspirin chemoprevention cautiously — bleeding risk rises with age, polypharmacy, CKD

— Aspirin and NSAIDs (sulindac) for chemoprevention — avoid or dose-cautiously in CKD stage ≥3, dialysis

Contrast imaging for staging: hydrate, consider non-contrast MRI in eGFR <30

— Chemotherapy dosing: capecitabine, 5-FU require renal dose adjustment; oxaliplatin neurotoxicity may worsen

— Urothelial cancer surveillance in Lynch already concerns the urinary tract — coordinate with nephrology/urology if hematuria

— Liver mets are common; differentiate cirrhosis-related changes from metastatic disease

Sulindac hepatotoxic — caution; avoid in advanced cirrhosis

— Irinotecan, capecitabine require hepatic dose adjustment

— Hepatoblastoma surveillance in FAP children (AFP every 3–6 mo + abdominal US to age 5)

— Optimize nutrition, anemia (IV iron preop), albumin

DVT prophylaxis essential — cancer patients are hypercoagulable

Key distinction: Don't equate "elderly with Lynch" with "no further action" — even when the patient won't benefit personally, the ethical and clinical imperative to inform at-risk relatives persists and is a Step 3 systems-of-care point.

Older adults with newly identified Lynch/FAP
Renal impairment
Hepatic impairment
Perioperative considerations
Solid White Background
Special Populations — Pregnancy, Pediatrics, and Reproductive Considerations

— Most Lynch surveillance starts age 20–25 — pediatric screening generally deferred

Constitutional MMR deficiency (CMMRD): biallelic MMR mutations — pediatric leukemia/lymphoma, brain tumors, GI cancers in childhood; café-au-lait spots; intensive pediatric surveillance protocols

Genetic testing of at-risk children typically offered around age 10–12 (when colonoscopy would begin) — ethics around childhood testing balanced because early surveillance is actionable

Hepatoblastoma surveillance: AFP + abdominal ultrasound every 3–6 mo from infancy to age 5–7 in known APC carriers

— Annual sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy from age 10–15

Colonoscopy in pregnancy: defer if possible; if urgent (bleeding, cancer suspicion), second trimester is preferred, with anesthesia/OB coordination

— Imaging: MRI without gadolinium preferred over CT for staging

— Chemotherapy: avoid in first trimester; 5-FU/oxaliplatin can be used 2nd/3rd trimester with MFM input

— Hysterectomy/BSO discussions in Lynch deferred until childbearing complete

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) available for known APC or MMR mutations — IVF with embryo selection

— Counsel on autosomal dominant inheritance — 50% transmission risk

MUTYH (recessive): partner testing changes recurrence risk

Combined OCPs or levonorgestrel IUD reduce endometrial/ovarian cancer risk — dual benefit

Step 3 management: In a pregnant Lynch carrier with new iron-deficiency anemia and hematochezia at 22 weeks, the next best step is flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the second trimester with OB-coordinated sedation, not waiting until postpartum — diagnostic delay risks tumor progression.

Pediatric Lynch syndrome
Pediatric FAP
Pregnancy considerations
Fertility and reproductive options
Contraception in Lynch women
Solid White Background
Complications and Adverse Outcomes

Synchronous/metachronous CRCs — hallmark of Lynch; up to 30% risk of second primary within 10 yr if segmental resection

Locally advanced/metastatic disease if surveillance missed — hepatic/peritoneal mets

Bowel obstruction, perforation, GI bleeding from large polyps or tumors

Desmoid tumors — second-leading cause of mortality after CRC in FAP; mesenteric desmoids cause bowel/ureteral obstruction, vascular compromise

Duodenal/periampullary adenocarcinoma — major cause of post-colectomy mortality

Thyroid cancer (cribriform-morular papillary)

Pouchitis, pouch adenomas/cancer after IPAA

Adhesive small-bowel obstruction post-surgery

— Endometrial cancer (often early stage with bleeding) — generally good prognosis

— Ovarian cancer — frequently advanced at diagnosis

— Urothelial cancer of upper tract — hematuria

— Pancreatic, gastric, hepatobiliary, small bowel, CNS, sebaceous tumors

— Post-colectomy: diarrhea, dehydration, electrolyte loss, vitamin B12 deficiency (terminal ileum involvement), stoma complications

— IPAA: pouchitis (treated with ciprofloxacin/metronidazole), cuffitis, fecal incontinence, reduced fertility in women (pelvic adhesions)

— Chemotherapy toxicities: oxaliplatin neuropathy, 5-FU mucositis/diarrhea, immune-related adverse events from checkpoint inhibitors (colitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, thyroiditis)

— Survivor guilt, anxiety, depression; impact on family relationships, insurability

Board pearl: After FAP colectomy, the two leading causes of death are duodenal/ampullary adenocarcinoma and mesenteric desmoid tumors — surveillance must extend beyond the colon. This is high-yield Step 3.

Cancer-related complications
FAP-specific complications
Lynch-specific extracolonic complications
Treatment-related complications
Psychosocial
Solid White Background
When to Escalate Care — Consults, Inpatient Triage, and ICU

Confirmed germline mutation → refer to genetic counselor, GI/colorectal surgery, gynecologic oncology (Lynch women), medical oncology as relevant

— New iron-deficiency anemia, hematochezia, weight loss in a known carrier → expedite colonoscopy

— Polyp burden unmanageable endoscopically → colorectal surgery for prophylactic colectomy planning

— High-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer → multidisciplinary tumor board

Acute GI bleed from polyp/tumor — admit, resuscitate, GI consult, transfusion

Bowel obstruction from tumor or desmoid — surgical consult, NG decompression, NPO, IVF

Perforation — emergent surgery

Postoperative complications: anastomotic leak (fever, peritonitis, leukocytosis post-day 3–5), pouchitis with sepsis, ileus

— Hemodynamically unstable GI bleed, septic shock from perforation/anastomotic leak, postoperative respiratory failure

— Checkpoint inhibitor severe immune-related AEs (myocarditis, pneumonitis, severe colitis)

Genetics/genetic counseling — every proband

Colorectal surgery — surveillance failure, prophylactic colectomy

Gyn oncology — Lynch women, risk-reducing surgery

Medical oncology — invasive cancer

Endocrinology — thyroid surveillance in FAP

Urology — hematuria in Lynch

Ophthalmology — CHRPE confirmation

Psychology/social work — coping, family disclosure

Reproductive endocrinology — PGD/IVF planning

CCS pearl: When a known FAP patient presents with acute abdomen and CT shows a mesenteric mass with bowel obstruction, your CCS sequence is: NPO, NG tube, IV fluids, type & cross, surgery consult, oncology consult, CT-guided biopsy to confirm desmoid vs malignancy before committing to surgery — desmoid resection is often avoided in favor of medical therapy.

Outpatient → urgent referral triggers
Inpatient admission triggers
ICU triggers
Consult roadmap (multidisciplinary)
Solid White Background
Key Differentials — Other Hereditary Polyposis and CRC Syndromes

Autosomal recessive, biallelic MUTYH mutations

— 10–100 adenomas, often right-sided, age 40–60

— Test when APC negative; sibling recurrence ~25%, children low risk unless partner carrier

STK11/LKB1 mutation, autosomal dominant

Mucocutaneous pigmentation (lips, buccal mucosa, fingers) + hamartomatous polyps (small bowel predominant) → intussusception

— Increased risk: GI, breast, pancreatic, ovarian (SCTAT), testicular Sertoli cell, cervical

SMAD4 or BMPR1A mutations

— Multiple juvenile (hamartomatous) polyps of colon, stomach, small bowel

— SMAD4 patients overlap with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) — epistaxis, AVMs

PTEN mutation; macrocephaly, trichilemmomas, mucocutaneous papillomas

— Breast, thyroid (follicular), endometrial, CRC, renal cancers

— GI hamartomas + ganglioneuromas

≥5 serrated polyps proximal to sigmoid, ≥2 >10 mm, or >20 serrated polyps total

— Often non-Mendelian; BRAF-mutated; ↑ CRC risk — annual colonoscopy

POLE/POLD1 germline mutations — oligopolyposis + CRC + endometrial

Ultramutated/MSS tumors, often respond to checkpoint inhibitors

Key distinction: Hamartomatous (Peutz-Jeghers, JPS, Cowden) vs adenomatous (FAP, AFAP, MAP) vs mismatch repair deficient (Lynch) — the polyp histology and pattern direct the genetic workup. Mucocutaneous pigmentation → Peutz-Jeghers; carpet of adenomas → FAP; right-sided cancer with few polyps but strong family history → Lynch.

Within the hereditary CRC family, differentiate Lynch/FAP from:
MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP)
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS)
Cowden syndrome (PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome)
Serrated polyposis syndrome
Polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP)
Solid White Background
Key Differentials — Sporadic and Acquired Mimics

~70% of all CRC; older patients (>50), left-sided predominance, adenoma-carcinoma sequence over a decade

— Risk factors: age, red/processed meat, obesity, smoking, alcohol, T2DM, sedentary lifestyle

— Tumor testing may show MSI-H due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (sporadic), not Lynch — distinguish with BRAF V600E (positive → sporadic)

— Long-standing ulcerative colitis or Crohn colitis (>8–10 yr); dysplasia → cancer

— Surveillance colonoscopy every 1–2 yr with chromoendoscopy

— Family history of IBD, not multiple cancers

— Solitary or few; not a polyposis syndrome

— Standard post-polypectomy surveillance per number/size/histology

— Distal, small, low risk unless meeting serrated polyposis criteria

— Inflammatory pseudopolyps in chronic colitis — not neoplastic, no cancer risk per se, but underlying IBD is the risk

— Pediatric/young adult; benign; mimics polyposis on imaging

Non-hereditary, acquired; diffuse GI polyposis + alopecia, nail dystrophy, skin hyperpigmentation, malabsorption

— Adults 50–60s; not autosomal dominant

— Meets Amsterdam I but MMR-proficient tumors — increased CRC risk but not Lynch; surveillance every 3–5 yr

Board pearl: A 65-year-old with MSI-H right-sided CRC, MLH1 loss on IHC, BRAF V600E mutated, and MLH1 promoter hypermethylated is sporadic — no germline testing needed. This branch-point logic is exam gold.

Sporadic CRC
Inflammatory bowel disease–associated CRC
Sporadic adenoma
Sporadic serrated/hyperplastic polyps
Pseudopolyposis (IBD)
Lymphoid hyperplasia / nodular lymphoid hyperplasia
Cronkhite-Canada syndrome
Familial CRC type X
Solid White Background
Long-Term Plan and Secondary Prevention

Colonoscopy every 1–2 yr lifelong from age 20–25 (or 2–5 yr before earliest family case)

Endometrial biopsy + transvaginal US annually from age 30–35, OR risk-reducing hysterectomy + BSO after childbearing

EGD with duodenal exam every 3–5 yr from age 40; H. pylori test/treat

Urinalysis annually from age 30–35 (especially MSH2)

— Skin exam annually for Muir-Torre features

— Neurologic review of systems

Aspirin chemoprevention discussed (75–325 mg daily)

— Combined OCP or levonorgestrel IUD for endometrial/ovarian risk reduction (premenopausal)

Lifestyle: avoid tobacco, limit red/processed meat and alcohol, maintain healthy BMI, exercise

Annual colonoscopy (pre-colectomy) from age 10–15

— Post-colectomy: pouch/rectum surveillance every 6–12 mo

EGD with side-viewing scope every 1–4 yr by Spigelman stage from 20–25

Annual thyroid ultrasound from late teens

Abdominal exam ± MRI for desmoids, especially after surgery

Children: hepatoblastoma surveillance to age 5–7

— Skin/dental/eye exams for stigmata

— All first-degree relatives offered targeted germline testing

— Children of carriers: testing typically at age 10–15 for FAP, age 18–25 for Lynch

Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) protects against health insurance and employment discrimination but not life, disability, or long-term care insurance — counsel before testing

Step 3 management: A newly diagnosed Lynch syndrome patient's next steps include cascade testing for all first-degree relatives, scheduling colonoscopy interval to 1–2 yr, referral for risk-reducing gynecologic surgery counseling, baseline EGD, and starting low-dose aspirin with shared decision-making.

Lynch syndrome long-term care
FAP long-term care
Cascade testing — never forget
Insurability and GINA
Solid White Background
Follow-Up, Monitoring Parameters, and Counseling

— Maintain a lifetime surveillance log: dates, findings, pathology, next due intervals

— Use a multidisciplinary registry when available — hereditary CRC clinics improve adherence

— Stool frequency, continence, dehydration, electrolytes, B12 annually

— Pouch surveillance every 6–12 mo (FAP-IPAA); rectal stump surveillance every 6 mo (IRA)

— Stoma care if end ileostomy

— CEA every 3–6 mo for 2 yr, then every 6 mo to 5 yr

— CT chest/abdomen/pelvis annually × 3–5 yr (higher risk stages)

— Colonoscopy at 1 yr post-resection, then per syndrome interval

— Continue Lynch extracolonic surveillance

— Checkpoint inhibitors: TSH, ACTH/cortisol, glucose, LFTs, lipase periodically; symptom-based for colitis/pneumonitis

— Oxaliplatin: neuropathy assessment

Genetic counseling at diagnosis and at major life events (marriage, pregnancy planning)

Mental health support — anxiety, "previvor" identity

Family disclosure: encourage proband to inform relatives; clinicians cannot directly contact relatives without consent (privacy)

Reproductive counseling: PGD/IVF options, prenatal testing

Lifestyle counseling: tobacco cessation, alcohol moderation, exercise, weight, diet

Vaccination: HPV (multiple cancer risks), routine adult immunizations

— Adherence to age-appropriate colonoscopy, gyn surveillance, EGD

— Documentation of pedigree update annually

CCS pearl: At every follow-up visit for a Lynch patient, your CCS orders should include updated three-generation pedigree, symptom review across Lynch-spectrum organs, scheduled colonoscopy/EGD/UA per protocol, and reinforcement of cascade testing for relatives — these are recurring management items, not one-time tasks.

Surveillance tracking
Post-colectomy monitoring
Post-cancer monitoring (Lynch CRC survivor)
Chemotherapy/immunotherapy monitoring
Counseling pillars
Quality measures
Solid White Background
Ethical, Legal, and Patient Safety Considerations

— Pre-test counseling: explain inheritance pattern, implications for relatives, insurance/employment ramifications, psychological impact, possibility of VUS

— Document shared decision-making; written consent often required

— Patients may decline — autonomy must be respected

— Predictive testing for adult-onset conditions (Lynch) generally deferred until age of consent

Childhood-onset/actionable conditions (FAP, with hepatoblastoma and adolescent screening) justify testing at age 10–12 — directly enables surveillance

— Always include the child in age-appropriate discussion (assent)

— US ethical/legal standard: clinician's duty is to the patient, who is encouraged and supported to inform relatives

— Clinicians cannot disclose genetic information to relatives without patient consent (HIPAA) except in rare jurisdictional exceptions

— Provide family letters to facilitate disclosure

— Prohibits health insurance and employment discrimination based on genetic info

— Does NOT cover life, disability, or long-term care insurance — patients should be informed before testing

— Do not act on VUS — counsel that classification may change

Surveillance failure is a top hereditary CRC safety event — closed-loop scheduling, registry tracking

Handoff to adult care for pediatric FAP patients at ~18 — warm handoff with transfer of records prevents missed surveillance

— Communicate pathology and tumor MMR/MSI results clearly to PCP, surgeon, and genetics — fragmented care risks missing Lynch diagnosis

— Discuss PGD/IVF nondirectively

— Prenatal testing decisions respect patient autonomy

Board pearl: A patient with confirmed Lynch syndrome refuses to inform her siblings. You may strongly encourage and facilitate disclosure (offer a family letter, joint visit), but you cannot directly contact siblings — patient confidentiality (HIPAA) generally prevails over duty to warn in the US.

Informed consent for genetic testing
Testing of minors
Duty to warn at-risk relatives
GINA protections
Variants of uncertain significance
Patient safety / transitions of care
Reproductive ethics
Solid White Background
High-Yield Associations and Rapid-Fire Clinical Facts

— Genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM

— Tumor signature: MSI-H, dMMR

Right-sided, mucinous, TILs, medullary histology

— Top extracolonic cancer in women: endometrial (often the sentinel cancer)

MSH2 carriers: highest urothelial risk

MLH1 sporadic mimics: BRAF V600E + promoter hypermethylation

CAPP2: aspirin reduces CRC ~50%

Pembrolizumab: first-line for dMMR/MSI-H metastatic CRC

— Amsterdam II (3-2-1 rule); revised Bethesda — largely replaced by universal tumor testing

— Gene: APC (5q21), autosomal dominant

>100 adenomas, 100% CRC by ~40 untreated

AFAP: <100 polyps, right-sided, later

CHRPE, osteomas, epidermoid cysts, supernumerary teeth, desmoids, duodenal polyps, thyroid (cribriform-morular), hepatoblastoma

Gardner = FAP + bones/skin; Turcot = FAP + medulloblastoma (vs Lynch + glioblastoma)

— Surgery: proctocolectomy + IPAA vs TAC + IRA

— Post-colectomy mortality: duodenal cancer and desmoids

— Spigelman staging guides duodenal surveillance

Autosomal recessive, biallelic MUTYH

— Mimics AFAP

— FAP child: hepatoblastoma surveillance with AFP + US to age 5

GINA: protects health insurance/employment only

— Universal tumor MMR/MSI testing recommended in all CRC and endometrial cancers

Key distinction: FAP polyps = adenomas (carpet, 100% cancer); Lynch polyps = few adenomas but accelerated; Peutz-Jeghers = hamartomas + pigmentation; JPS = juvenile hamartomas; MAP = recessive adenomatous mimic of AFAP. Memorize the polyp histology + inheritance pattern + pathognomonic stigma — that triad solves most exam stems.

Lynch syndrome rapid-fire
FAP rapid-fire
MUTYH-associated polyposis
Pediatric
Step 3 systems
Solid White Background
Board Question Stem Patterns

— 38-year-old with right-sided CRC; tumor IHC shows loss of MSH2 and MSH6 → next step: germline MMR gene testing with genetic counseling (not BRAF, not MLH1 methylation)

— 68-year-old with MSI-H CRC, MLH1 loss, BRAF V600E positivesporadic MSI tumor, no germline testing needed

— Teen with hundreds of colon polyps, mandibular osteoma, epidermoid cyst, CHRPE on dilated examAPC germline testing; plan prophylactic colectomy

— 45-year-old with 30 right-sided adenomas, parents unaffected, sibling affected → autosomal recessive pattern → MUTYH testing

— Lynch carrier woman age 50, hasn't had gyn exam → next step: endometrial sampling + transvaginal US, discuss risk-reducing hysterectomy + BSO

— Stage IV dMMR/MSI-H CRC → first-line pembrolizumab, not FOLFOX

— Patient post-IRA at 40 with new anemia and weight loss → next: EGD with side-viewing scope (duodenal/ampullary cancer) and proctoscopy (rectal stump)

— Post-colectomy patient with abdominal wall mass → biopsy/MRI → desmoid; manage medically (sulindac ± tamoxifen), avoid resection

— Proband with known APC mutation; next best step for asymptomatic 12-year-old child → targeted APC germline testing + initiate sigmoidoscopy at 10–15

— Lynch patient refuses to inform siblings → encourage disclosure, offer family letter; do not breach confidentiality

— Lynch carrier asks about prevention → daily aspirin (CAPP2 evidence), shared decision-making

Step 3 management: Recognize the three branch points that dominate exam stems: (1) tumor MMR/MSI result → germline pathway, (2) MLH1 loss → BRAF/methylation reflex, (3) polyp count + inheritance pattern → APC vs MUTYH vs MMR testing.

Stem pattern 1 — Universal testing trigger
Stem pattern 2 — Sporadic vs Lynch branch
Stem pattern 3 — FAP recognition
Stem pattern 4 — AFAP/MAP
Stem pattern 5 — Lynch surveillance gap
Stem pattern 6 — Metastatic dMMR CRC
Stem pattern 7 — FAP post-colectomy complication
Stem pattern 8 — Desmoid in FAP
Stem pattern 9 — Cascade testing
Stem pattern 10 — Ethics
Stem pattern 11 — Aspirin chemoprevention
Solid White Background
One-Line Recap

Lynch syndrome and FAP are the two pillars of hereditary colorectal cancer — Lynch (autosomal dominant MMR gene defects causing MSI-H tumors with right-sided CRC and extracolonic risks led by endometrial cancer, managed by 1–2 year colonoscopy, risk-reducing hysterectomy/BSO, aspirin chemoprevention, and pembrolizumab for metastatic dMMR disease) and FAP (autosomal dominant APC mutation producing carpet polyposis with 100% CRC risk requiring prophylactic colectomy, lifelong duodenal/thyroid surveillance, and recognition of desmoids and CHRPE) — both demand universal tumor MMR/MSI testing of CRC, germline confirmation with counseling, and cascade testing of relatives.

Universal tumor MMR/MSI testing on every new CRC and endometrial cancer; MLH1 loss → reflex BRAF + methylation; other MMR loss → germline testing directly
Lynch surveillance: colonoscopy q1–2 yr from 20–25, endometrial sampling/TVUS or risk-reducing hyst-BSO, EGD q3–5 yr, annual UA, aspirin chemoprevention; first-line pembrolizumab for metastatic dMMR CRC
FAP surveillance: annual scope from 10–15, prophylactic proctocolectomy with IPAA (or TAC-IRA) in late teens, EGD with Spigelman staging, annual thyroid US, hepatoblastoma screening in children; post-colectomy mortality dominated by duodenal cancer and desmoids
Cascade testing of first-degree relatives and GINA-aware counseling (covers health insurance/employment, not life/disability) are non-negotiable Step 3 systems-of-care duties — facilitate but never breach patient confidentiality to warn relatives directly
Solid White Background
bottom of page