top of page

Eduovisual

Multisystem Processes & Disorders

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: management

Clinical Overview and When to Suspect CRE Infection

Carbapenemase production (CP-CRE): KPC (most common in US), NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48-like

Non-CP CRE: ESBL/AmpC + porin loss or efflux pump overexpression

— Mechanism dictates therapy — newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors work against some but not all carbapenemases

— Healthcare-associated UTI, pneumonia, bacteremia, or intra-abdominal infection failing carbapenem or extended-spectrum cephalosporin

— Patient with recent hospitalization, LTACH, SNF stay, dialysis, transplant, or chemotherapy

International medical travel (especially Indian subcontinent → NDM; Mediterranean/Middle East → OXA-48)

— Prior CRE colonization on surveillance rectal swab

— Indwelling devices (Foley, central line, PEG, ventilator) + persistent fever despite broad-spectrum therapy

— Prolonged ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, prior carbapenem or fluoroquinolone exposure within 90 days

— Solid organ or stem cell transplant, neutropenia

— Structural lung disease, decubitus ulcers, recent abdominal surgery

Board pearl: A nursing-home resident readmitted with urosepsis whose urine cultures grew K. pneumoniae resistant to ertapenem and meropenem should trigger immediate isolation, infectious disease consult, and empiric coverage with a newer agent (ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam) rather than continuing standard carbapenem.

Step 3 management: Do not wait for susceptibilities if CRE risk is high and patient is septic — escalate empirically and send isolate for carbapenemase identification (Xpert Carba-R, mCIM/eCIM, or molecular panel) to guide definitive therapy.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are Enterobacterales (E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter, Serratia, Citrobacter, Proteus) that are resistant to ≥1 carbapenem (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, ertapenem) or produce a carbapenemase.
CDC urgent threat — ~13,000 hospital cases/year in the US, mortality 40–50% for bacteremia.
Mechanisms of resistance:
When to suspect CRE on Step 3:
Risk factors clustering on stems:
Solid White Background
Presentation Patterns and Key History

Complicated UTI / pyelonephritis — most frequent presentation; often catheter-associated

Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) — particularly K. pneumoniae

Bacteremia — central line-associated or secondary from urinary/intra-abdominal source; mortality up to 50%

Intra-abdominal infections — post-surgical abscess, cholangitis, secondary peritonitis

Surgical site and wound infections, including post-transplant

— Less commonly: meningitis (post-neurosurgical), endocarditis (rare)

Antibiotic exposure within 90 days — carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, 3rd/4th-gen cephalosporins

Healthcare exposure — hospitalization ≥3 days within 90 days, LTACH/SNF residence, hemodialysis

Devices — duration of Foley, central line, ETT, biliary stent

Travel — international travel with hospitalization abroad ("medical tourism")

Colonization history — prior positive rectal/perirectal swab, prior CRE infection

— Immunosuppression: transplant regimen, chemotherapy, neutropenia, HIV

— Persistent fever >48–72 hours on appropriate-dose meropenem

— Repeat blood cultures positive despite "in-vitro susceptible" therapy (think mechanism mismatch)

— Recurrent UTI in catheterized patient after multiple courses

Key distinction: ESBL organisms are resistant to ceftriaxone but susceptible to carbapenems — treat with meropenem. CRE are resistant to carbapenems and require newer β-lactam/BLI combinations or cefiderocol. Misclassifying ESBL as CRE leads to unnecessary use of last-line agents and resistance pressure.

Board pearl: A returning traveler hospitalized in India or Pakistan within the past year with new Gram-negative bacteremia should raise concern for NDM-producing CRE — NDM is not covered by ceftazidime-avibactam alone; add aztreonam or use cefiderocol.

CRE causes the same syndromes as other Enterobacterales — the clue is the host, exposure history, and treatment failure pattern, not a unique clinical syndrome.
Common syndromes:
Pivotal history elements:
Treatment failure clues in the stem:
Solid White Background
Physical Exam Findings and Hemodynamic Assessment

qSOFA ≥2 (RR ≥22, SBP ≤100, altered mentation) → high mortality risk, expedite ICU evaluation

MAP <65 despite 30 mL/kg crystalloid → septic shock, start vasopressors (norepinephrine first-line)

— Hypothermia in elderly/immunosuppressed is as ominous as fever

— Lactate ≥2 → tissue hypoperfusion; ≥4 → severe shock

Urinary: CVA tenderness, suprapubic pain, cloudy/foul catheter drainage, perinephric fullness

Pulmonary: crackles, consolidation, purulent ETT secretions, increased ventilator pressures, new infiltrate

Intra-abdominal: focal tenderness, peritoneal signs, surgical wound erythema/discharge, drain output character

Vascular access: central line site erythema, tenderness, exit-site purulence → suspect CLABSI

Skin/wound: decubitus ulcers (especially sacral, heel), surgical site dehiscence, necrotic tissue

— Document every indwelling device: Foley, CVC, PICC, arterial line, ETT, NGT, PEG, biliary stent, drains

— Each device is a potential source AND a reason source control may fail

— Petechiae/purpura, acrocyanosis → DIC from severe sepsis

— Decreased urine output → AKI

— Altered mentation → sepsis-associated encephalopathy or meningitis (post-neurosurgical CRE)

CCS pearl: On a CCS case with suspected CRE sepsis, the first orders should be two sets of blood cultures, urine culture, lactate, CBC, BMP, lactate, IV access ×2, 30 mL/kg LR, and empiric anti-CRE therapy within 1 hour — then locate and address the source (remove/exchange catheter, drain abscess, debride wound).

Board pearl: Persistent bacteremia >72 hours mandates search for undrained focus, endovascular source, or biofilm-associated device that requires removal.

No pathognomonic exam findings — CRE infection mimics other Gram-negative infections. Focus the exam on source identification, severity of sepsis, and device assessment.
General/vital signs:
Source-directed exam:
Device inventory (CCS-style checklist):
Signs of complications:
Solid White Background
Diagnostic Workup — Initial Labs, Imaging, and Cultures

Two sets of blood cultures from separate sites (peripheral + line if CLABSI suspected — differential time to positivity ≥2 hours suggests line source)

Urine culture (catheterized: replace catheter and culture from new one per IDSA)

Sputum/ETT aspirate or BAL for HAP/VAP — quantitative cultures preferred (BAL ≥10⁴ CFU/mL)

Wound/drain/peritoneal fluid cultures with Gram stain

Stool surveillance swab if rule-out colonization in high-risk admission

CBC with differential — leukocytosis, bandemia, or leukopenia (poor prognosis)

BMP — AKI from sepsis or nephrotoxic exposure; baseline for renal dosing of polymyxins/aminoglycosides

LFTs — hepatic dosing considerations and source assessment (cholangitis)

Lactate, procalcitonin — severity; PCT can help with antibiotic de-escalation

Coagulation panel, fibrinogen, D-dimer if DIC suspected

ABG if respiratory distress or shock

MIC values for meropenem, imipenem, ertapenem (not just S/I/R)

Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol susceptibilities

Carbapenemase identification: Xpert Carba-R (PCR for KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48), mCIM/eCIM phenotypic tests

Chest X-ray for all septic patients; CT chest if VAP unresolving

Renal/bladder US or CT abdomen/pelvis with contrast for urinary source, obstruction, abscess

CT abdomen for suspected intra-abdominal source — guides drainage

Step 3 management: Request carbapenemase mechanism testing on every CRE isolate — KPC and OXA-48 are covered by ceftazidime-avibactam; NDM/VIM/IMP (metallo-β-lactamases) are NOT, and require cefiderocol or ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam.

Board pearl: Ertapenem-resistant but meropenem-susceptible isolates often reflect porin loss + ESBL/AmpC, not carbapenemase — still treat as CRE for infection control purposes.

Cultures are the cornerstone — CRE is a microbiologic diagnosis. Obtain before first antibiotic dose when feasible, but do not delay therapy in septic shock beyond 45 minutes.
Initial microbiology orders:
Laboratory workup:
Susceptibility testing — what to request:
Initial imaging:
Solid White Background
Diagnostic Workup — Advanced and Confirmatory Studies

mCIM (modified carbapenem inactivation method) — detects any carbapenemase production

eCIM — distinguishes metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs: NDM, VIM, IMP) from serine carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48)

— Carba NP test — rapid colorimetric

Xpert Carba-R PCR — directly identifies KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48 genes (results in ~1 hour)

Multiplex PCR panels (BioFire BCID2, Verigene) on positive blood cultures — speed time to targeted therapy by 24–48 hours

Whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigation and epidemiology

CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast — abscess, perforation, obstruction; obtain early if intra-abdominal source possible

MRCP or ERCP for biliary obstruction with cholangitis

TTE → TEE for persistent bacteremia >72h or prosthetic valve/device — though Gram-negative endocarditis is rare, miss it and you lose the patient

Tagged WBC scan or PET-CT for occult focus in recurrent bacteremia

— Every 48 hours until clearance for Gram-negative bacteremia

— Persistent positivity → endovascular source, undrained collection, or inadequate dosing/wrong drug

Polymyxins (colistin, polymyxin B) — narrow therapeutic window, high nephrotoxicity

Aminoglycosides — peak/trough levels

Vancomycin/β-lactam TDM when extended infusions used (meropenem-vaborbactam)

Board pearl: A CRE isolate that is mCIM positive and eCIM positive = metallo-β-lactamase (NDM/VIM/IMP). First-line is cefiderocol or ceftazidime-avibactam PLUS aztreonam (aztreonam evades the MBL; avibactam protects aztreonam from co-produced ESBLs/AmpC).

Key distinction: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter are NOT Enterobacterales — different organisms, different drug choices (Acinetobacter often needs sulbactam-durlobactam or minocycline + polymyxin).

Carbapenemase characterization drives therapy — confirmatory testing distinguishes mechanisms that determine which new agent will work.
Phenotypic confirmatory tests:
Molecular/genotypic testing:
Source-control imaging:
Repeat blood cultures:
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM):
Pharmacy/ID stewardship consultation within 24 hours of identification is now considered standard of care.
Solid White Background
Risk Stratification and First-Line Management Logic

Uncomplicated cystitis with CRE: nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin (single dose), ciprofloxacin, TMP-SMX, or aminoglycoside if susceptible — reserve newer agents for systemic infection

Pyelonephritis/cUTI: ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, or cefiderocol; aminoglycoside (plazomicin) acceptable alternative

Infection outside urinary tract (bacteremia, HAP/VAP, intra-abdominal): preferred agent depends on carbapenemase

KPC producers: ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, or imipenem-relebactam (all preferred)

OXA-48-like: ceftazidime-avibactam (vaborbactam/relebactam do NOT cover OXA-48)

NDM/VIM/IMP (MBLs): cefiderocol OR ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam

Non-CP CRE (porin loss): often susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam; cefepime/extended-infusion meropenem may suffice if MIC favorable

— Polymyxins (colistin), tigecycline (low serum levels), older aminoglycosides — reserve as salvage or combination, not first-line

— Generally NOT recommended when a new β-lactam/BLI is active — monotherapy with the preferred agent has equal or better outcomes with less toxicity

— Combination may be considered for MBLs, persistent bacteremia, or salvage

— Remove infected lines/catheters, drain abscesses, debride necrotic tissue, relieve obstruction

— Antibiotics fail without source control

Step 3 management: For a critically ill patient with suspected CRE bacteremia from unknown source: start ceftazidime-avibactam empirically (covers KPC and OXA-48, the most common US carbapenemases), obtain cultures and carbapenemase testing, consult ID, and address source control simultaneously.

Board pearl: Duration for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteremia with source control is 7 days (Yahav trial, non-inferior to 14 days) — applies to CRE bacteremia too if source controlled and patient improving.

CRE therapy is stratified by: (1) site/severity of infection, (2) carbapenemase mechanism, (3) host factors (renal function, allergies), and (4) local susceptibility data.
IDSA 2024 framework (high-yield):
Mechanism-directed therapy:
Avoid as monotherapy for serious CRE infection:
Combination therapy:
Source control is non-negotiable:
Solid White Background
Pharmacotherapy — First-Line Drug Regimen Details

— Dose: 2.5 g IV q8h infused over 2 hours (normal renal function)

— Covers: KPC, OXA-48, ESBL, AmpC, P. aeruginosa; NOT MBLs

— Pairs with aztreonam 2 g IV q6h for MBL coverage (avibactam protects aztreonam from co-produced serine β-lactamases)

— Renal dose adjustment required (CrCl <50)

— Watch for emergent resistance during therapy — repeat susceptibility if clinical failure

— Dose: 4 g IV q8h over 3 hours

— Covers: KPC primarily; NOT OXA-48, NOT MBLs

— Best for confirmed KPC; AE: headache, infusion reactions

— Dose: 1.25 g IV q6h over 30 min

— Covers: KPC, P. aeruginosa; NOT OXA-48, NOT MBLs

— Lowers seizure threshold (imipenem) — caution in CNS disease, renal failure

— Dose: 2 g IV q8h over 3 hours

— Covers: all carbapenemases including MBLs, Stenotrophomonas, Acinetobacter

— Preferred for NDM/VIM/IMP producers or pan-resistant Gram-negatives

— CREDIBLE-CR trial showed higher mortality in Acinetobacter subgroup — use selectively; favor for CRE/Pseudomonas

— Iron-dependent uptake — works in iron-limited infection environments

Tigecycline (high-dose 200 mg load, then 100 mg q12h) — intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissue; AVOID for bacteremia or UTI (poor serum/urine levels); black box: increased mortality

Eravacycline — improved over tigecycline for intra-abdominal

Plazomicin — aminoglycoside, useful for cUTI, monitor renal function and levels

Polymyxin B preferred over colistin for systemic infection (better PK); both nephrotoxic and neurotoxic

Fosfomycin IV — UTI; oral form for uncomplicated cystitis only

Key distinction: Vaborbactam and relebactam do NOT cover OXA-48; avibactam DOES cover OXA-48. If OXA-48 confirmed → ceftazidime-avibactam or cefiderocol.

Board pearl: Emergent ceftazidime-avibactam resistance during therapy is well-described (KPC mutations) — if bacteremia persists, repeat cultures and re-test susceptibility, then switch agent.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI):
Meropenem-vaborbactam:
Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam:
Cefiderocol (siderophore cephalosporin):
Adjunctive/salvage agents:
Solid White Background
Source Control, Stewardship, and Infection Control Bundles

Remove non-tunneled CVCs/PICCs in CRE bacteremia

— Tunneled catheters/ports: remove if bacteremia persists >72h, septic shock, endocarditis, suppurative thrombophlebitis, or metastatic infection

— Salvage with antibiotic lock therapy is rarely successful for CRE

Replace the Foley catheter (don't just remove) before culturing if catheter remains needed

— Relieve obstruction (stent, nephrostomy) for obstructive pyelonephritis

— Drain perinephric or prostatic abscess

— Percutaneous or surgical drainage of abscess >3–5 cm

— Source control surgery for perforation, necrosis, anastomotic leak

— Remove/replace infected biliary stents

— Suction, bronchoscopy for retained secretions/mucus plugs

— Consider tracheostomy revision if device-related

— Inhaled colistin/aminoglycoside for VAP is adjunctive only, not monotherapy

Contact precautions — gown + gloves; single room preferred

— Dedicated equipment; hand hygiene with soap and water or alcohol

Surveillance rectal swabs for high-risk contacts

Chlorhexidine bathing in ICUs

— Notify receiving facility on transfer ("interfacility transfer form")

Active outbreak response — cohort patients, dedicated staff, environmental cleaning audits

ID consult mandatory for confirmed CRE infection in most institutions

— Daily reassessment; de-escalate to oral or narrower agent when possible

— Avoid unnecessary carbapenem exposure to limit selection pressure

— Empiric carbapenem use only when high pretest probability of ESBL — narrow on susceptibilities

CCS pearl: On a CRE case, order "contact isolation" immediately on admission; failure to isolate is a common patient-safety question. Also order chlorhexidine bath daily and ID consult.

Board pearl: Patients colonized with CRE remain colonized for months to >1 year — flag the chart; precautions on every readmission until decolonization confirmed (typically 3 negative weekly swabs off antibiotics).

Source control is mandatory — even the best antibiotic fails without it.
Vascular catheter management:
Urinary source:
Intra-abdominal:
Respiratory:
Infection control (CDC):
Antimicrobial stewardship:
Solid White Background
Special Populations — Elderly and Renal/Hepatic Impairment

— Reduced GFR (use measured CrCl, not estimated) — most CRE drugs require renal dose adjustment

— Lower muscle mass → serum creatinine underestimates renal dysfunction

— Polypharmacy → drug interactions (e.g., aztreonam + vitamin K antagonists may increase INR)

— Higher risk of C. difficile from broad-spectrum therapy

— Increased delirium with cefepime, imipenem (neurotoxicity)

Ceftazidime-avibactam: CrCl 31–50 → 1.25 g q8h; CrCl 16–30 → 0.94 g q12h; CrCl 6–15 → 0.94 g q24h; HD → 0.94 g q48h (give after HD)

Meropenem-vaborbactam: CrCl <50 requires significant reduction

Imipenem-relebactam: Renal adjustment; seizure risk rises in renal failure

Cefiderocol: Adjust for CrCl <60 AND augmented renal clearance ≥120 mL/min (increase dose q6h)

Polymyxins, aminoglycosides: Nephrotoxic — avoid if possible; TDM essential

— Most newer agents are dialyzable — dose AFTER HD sessions

— CRRT dosing tables differ from intermittent HD; consult pharmacy

— Cefiderocol dosing in CRRT: 1.5 g q12h typical

— Most agents are renally cleared — minor hepatic adjustment needed

Tigecycline: reduce in Child-Pugh C (50 mg q12h after load)

— Watch LFTs with prolonged courses

— Young trauma/burn/sepsis patients with CrCl >130 — underdosing risk

— Use extended-infusion β-lactams; consider TDM

Step 3 management: In an elderly LTACH patient with CRE bacteremia and CrCl 25, prescribe ceftazidime-avibactam 0.94 g IV q12h with pharmacy verification; recheck SCr daily; reassess dose with renal function changes.

Board pearl: Cefiderocol underdosing in augmented renal clearance has been linked to clinical failure — always check for ARC in young septic patients.

Elderly patients are disproportionately affected — LTACH residents, nursing home patients, multiple comorbidities, frequent healthcare exposure.
Pharmacokinetic considerations in elderly:
Renal dose adjustments (key examples):
CRRT/hemodialysis:
Hepatic impairment:
Augmented renal clearance (ARC):
Solid White Background
Special Populations — Pregnancy, Pediatrics, and Immunocompromised

β-lactams (including CAZ-AVI, meropenem-vaborbactam) are generally safe (Category B equivalent — no convincing evidence of harm)

Avoid: tigecycline, eravacycline (teeth/bone effects, Category D), aminoglycosides (ototoxicity to fetus — use only if life-threatening), fluoroquinolones (cartilage), polymyxins (limited data, nephrotoxicity)

Cefiderocol: limited pregnancy data but no signal of harm in animal studies; use if no alternative

Nitrofurantoin and TMP-SMX: avoid at term (kernicterus) and 1st trimester (TMP-SMX antifolate), respectively — but options for CRE cystitis if no alternative

— OB/ID multidisciplinary consult essential

— CRE in children is rising, especially NICU outbreaks and immunocompromised hosts

Ceftazidime-avibactam approved ≥3 months for cUTI and cIAI

Meropenem-vaborbactam approved ≥18 years; pediatric data emerging

Cefiderocol approved ≥3 months (cUTI) in 2024

— Weight-based dosing; consult pediatric ID

— Avoid tetracyclines <8 years (tooth staining)

— High-risk populations; CRE is leading cause of mortality in liver transplant recipients

— Pre-transplant screening for CRE colonization in endemic regions

— Avoid agents with drug interactions: rifampin with tacrolimus/cyclosporine; aminoglycosides + calcineurin inhibitors → synergistic nephrotoxicity

— Lower threshold for combination therapy and longer durations

— Surveillance cultures more frequent

— Empiric coverage should include anti-CRE agent if prior colonization or local high prevalence

— Add G-CSF consideration; ID and oncology co-management

— Persistent fever → check for invasive fungal disease

— Not independently increased risk unless advanced (CD4 <200) with healthcare exposure

— Drug interactions: protease inhibitors metabolize via CYP — most new β-lactam/BLIs minimal interaction

Board pearl: A liver transplant recipient with rejection on high-dose immunosuppression and prior CRE rectal colonization who develops cholangitis should receive empiric ceftazidime-avibactam while awaiting cultures — don't wait for mechanism confirmation.

Key distinction: Tigecycline is contraindicated in pregnancy and pediatrics <8 — choose a β-lactam-based regimen.

Pregnancy:
Pediatrics:
Solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT):
Neutropenic fever with CRE risk:
HIV:
Solid White Background
Complications and Adverse Outcomes

— CRE bacteremia mortality: 40–50% historically with polymyxin-based therapy; 20–30% with newer β-lactam/BLI agents

— Independent risk factors: delay in active therapy, septic shock, neutropenia, inadequate source control

— Refractory hypotension despite vasopressors

— ARDS from VAP or sepsis-related capillary leak

— AKI requiring CRRT — both from sepsis and nephrotoxic drugs

— DIC, sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, hepatic dysfunction

Polymyxin nephrotoxicity — 30–60% incidence; often dose-limiting

Polymyxin neurotoxicity — paresthesias, neuromuscular blockade

Aminoglycoside ototoxicity (vestibular and cochlear), nephrotoxicity

Tigecycline: nausea/vomiting, hepatotoxicity, increased all-cause mortality (black box)

Imipenem-relebactam: seizures (especially renal failure, prior seizure history)

Cefiderocol: infusion reactions, rare hypersensitivity

C. difficile colitis from broad-spectrum exposure

Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in KPC has been reported within days of starting therapy (KPC-3 mutations); paradoxically may restore carbapenem susceptibility

— Always re-culture if clinical failure

— Heteroresistance complicates colistin therapy

— Persistent gut colonization → recurrent UTI, bacteremia

— Risk factors for recurrence: incomplete source control, immunosuppression, devices not removed

— Decolonization strategies (oral non-absorbable antibiotics, FMT) experimental, not routinely recommended

— Septic thrombophlebitis at line site

— Mycotic aneurysm (rare but devastating)

— Endocarditis (rare with Enterobacterales) — consider TEE for persistent bacteremia

— Post-sepsis syndrome: cognitive impairment, functional decline, depression, increased 1-year mortality

— Higher LTACH/SNF placement rates after CRE bacteremia

Board pearl: New ceftazidime-avibactam resistance during therapy may make the isolate re-susceptible to meropenem — re-test full panel before assuming the agent failed for mechanistic reasons.

Step 3 management: Persistent fever or positive cultures at 72h → repeat blood cultures, repeat susceptibility, image for occult source, evaluate all devices for removal, escalate ID involvement, consider TEE.

Mortality:
Septic shock and MODS:
Treatment-related complications:
Resistance emergence:
Recurrent infection and colonization:
Endovascular complications:
Long-term consequences:
Solid White Background
When to Escalate Care — ICU, Consults, Triage

— Septic shock (vasopressor requirement after fluid resuscitation)

— Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation or HFNC

— Lactate ≥4 or rising despite resuscitation

— Altered mentation with worsening trajectory

— Multi-organ dysfunction (SOFA increase ≥2)

— Need for invasive monitoring or CRRT

— Hemodynamically stable on single vasopressor weaning

— Improving lactate, stable mental status

— Frequent monitoring needs but no imminent organ failure

Infectious Diseases — every confirmed CRE infection; many institutions require ID approval for new β-lactam/BLI agents (stewardship gate)

Clinical Pharmacy — dosing, TDM, drug interactions

Infection Prevention/Hospital Epidemiology — isolation, contact tracing, surveillance, outbreak investigation

Source-control specialist based on site: Surgery (abdominal/wound), IR (drainage), Urology (obstruction/stones), Cardiology (endovascular)

— Notify receiving facility of CRE colonization/infection (federal requirement in many states via interfacility transfer form)

— Transport with PPE, single ambulance

— Continue contact precautions on arrival

— CRE bacteremia in frail elderly LTACH residents has high mortality — early goals-of-care discussion is part of best practice

— Palliative care consult appropriate when prognosis poor or treatment burden high

— Document advance directives, surrogate decision-maker

— Some patients complete therapy at home or SNF with PICC line + IV agent (e.g., ertapenem if susceptible, cefiderocol via portable pump)

— Requires reliable follow-up, weekly labs, ID oversight

— Many newer agents not OPAT-friendly (3-hour infusions, q6–8h dosing)

CCS pearl: On a CCS CRE sepsis case, transfer to ICU as soon as septic shock criteria are met — delays cost simulated mortality points. Order ID consult, infection prevention notification, and pharmacy consult in the first 24 hours.

Board pearl: Failure to notify the receiving facility of CRE status on transfer is a patient safety event and may violate state law.

Immediate ICU admission criteria:
Step-down unit:
Mandatory consultations:
Inter-facility transfer:
Code status and goals of care:
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) considerations:
Solid White Background
Key Differentials — Other Resistant Gram-Negatives

— Resistant to 3rd-gen cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, ceftazidime)

SUSCEPTIBLE to carbapenems — meropenem is first-line

— Often confused with CRE on stems — read susceptibilities carefully

— Mortality much lower than CRE if treated with active agent

MERINO trial: piperacillin-tazobactam is inferior to meropenem for ESBL bacteremia → use carbapenem

— Inducible resistance — may appear susceptible to ceftriaxone initially, then "break through"

— Use cefepime or carbapenem; avoid ceftriaxone for serious infection

— NOT CRE unless carbapenem MIC elevated

— Not Enterobacterales but commonly co-occurs

— Preferred: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol

— Mechanisms: AmpC overexpression, porin loss, efflux pumps

— Higher mortality than CRE

— Treatment: sulbactam-durlobactam (new), high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, minocycline, polymyxin, cefiderocol (selective)

— OXA-23 most common mechanism; different agents needed

— Intrinsically resistant to carbapenems and most β-lactams

— Treat: TMP-SMX first-line, minocycline, levofloxacin, cefiderocol

— Common in immunocompromised, prior carbapenem exposure

— Not Enterobacterales — easy distractor

— Cystic fibrosis patients, immunocompromised

— TMP-SMX, meropenem, minocycline

Key distinction: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas/Acinetobacter ≠ CRE — different organisms, different first-line drugs. The boards love this trap. Always identify the organism before choosing therapy.

Board pearl: Pip-tazo for ESBL bacteremia is inferior to meropenem (MERINO) — but don't reflexively call ESBL "CRE." ESBL = carbapenem-susceptible; CRE = carbapenem-resistant.

ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (CTX-M, SHV, TEM):
AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (SPACE: Serratia, Pseudomonas, indole-positive Proteus/Providencia, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella):
Difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-Pa):
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB):
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia:
Burkholderia cepacia complex:
Solid White Background
Key Differentials — Non-Infectious and Other Mimics

— β-lactams (including new agents) can cause drug-induced fever

— Eosinophilia, rash, relative bradycardia may accompany

— Resolves within 48–72 hours of discontinuation

Re-challenge contraindicated if severe (SJS/TEN, DRESS)

— Hospitalized septic patients are hypercoagulable

— Suppurative thrombophlebitis at vascular access site → persistent bacteremia plus VTE

— D-dimer non-specific; image with CT or US

— The most common true "antibiotic failure" — antibiotics can't penetrate avascular collections

— Pursue aggressive imaging: CT abdomen/pelvis, MRI spine if back pain, TEE for endovascular

— Vertebral osteomyelitis/epidural abscess in IVDU or post-spinal procedure

— Often co-occurs after broad-spectrum exposure

— Fever, diarrhea, leukocytosis — easy to attribute to original infection

— Send stool toxin/PCR if loose stools ≥3 in 24h

— Late (2–8 weeks) onset rash, eosinophilia, hepatitis, fever

— Reported with vancomycin, sulfonamides, β-lactams

— Stop offending drug; supportive care; ID and dermatology consult

— Failure to remove infected device, drain abscess, or relieve obstruction is the #1 reason a "right antibiotic" fails

— Reassess source daily

— CRE may be one of several pathogens; missed anaerobes in intra-abdominal source, missed fungi in immunocompromised

— Repeat cultures, expand panel

— PE, MI, transfusion reaction, adrenal insufficiency, pancreatitis, acalculous cholecystitis

— Always reassess the whole picture

Step 3 management: If a CRE patient on appropriate ceftazidime-avibactam remains febrile at 72h, don't reflexively change the antibiotic — first repeat cultures, image for occult source, evaluate devices, check for C. diff and drug fever.

Board pearl: Persistent positive blood cultures on appropriate therapy = endovascular or undrained focus until proven otherwise — order TEE and cross-sectional imaging.

Non-infectious causes of persistent fever and "treatment failure" on appropriate anti-CRE therapy:
Drug fever:
Venous thromboembolism:
Undrained abscess or occult focus:
C. difficile colitis:
Drug reactions/DRESS:
Inadequate source control:
Wrong organism or polymicrobial infection:
Hospital-acquired complications mimicking sepsis:
Solid White Background
Secondary Prevention, Discharge Planning, and Long-Term Care

Routine decolonization of CRE gut carriage is NOT recommended — selective digestive decontamination (SDD) showed mixed results; risk of further resistance

— Investigational: fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for recurrent CRE infections — promising but not standard

— Daily chlorhexidine bathing in healthcare settings reduces transmission

— Most CRE infections require IV therapy completion — coordinate OPAT with home infusion or SNF

— PICC line placement, weekly labs (CBC, BMP, LFTs), ID follow-up within 1–2 weeks

— Oral step-down options limited; fluoroquinolones, TMP-SMX, or fosfomycin for cystitis if susceptible

Document mechanism and susceptibility on discharge summary so future providers can choose appropriate empiric therapy

— Uncomplicated cUTI: 7–10 days

— Bacteremia with source control: 7 days (Yahav)

— Bacteremia without source control or complicated: 14 days

— HAP/VAP: 7 days (IDSA recommends shorter courses)

— Intra-abdominal with source control: 4–7 days (STOP-IT trial principle)

— Endocarditis (rare): 6 weeks

— Osteomyelitis: 6 weeks IV ± oral step-down

— Replace any indwelling device that was potential source

— Avoid Foley catheters if at all possible (use bladder scanner, intermittent cath)

— Reassess all lines daily — remove ASAP

Pneumococcal (PCV15/PCV20), influenza annually, COVID-19, RSV ≥60, shingles ≥50 — reduce future infectious complications

— Discuss with PCP within 30 days post-discharge

Electronic health record flag for CRE colonization/infection — triggers isolation on every readmission

— Share with PCP, dialysis center, dental provider

— State health department reporting in many states (CRE is reportable)

— Hand hygiene at home

— Inform any future healthcare provider of CRE history

— Wound and device care if applicable

Board pearl: CRE is a reportable condition in most states — failure to report is a public health violation.

Step 3 management: At discharge, document mechanism (e.g., "KPC-producing K. pneumoniae"), susceptibility profile, total antibiotic duration, OPAT plan, ID follow-up date, and EHR flag for contact precautions.

Decolonization:
Discharge antibiotic planning:
Duration of therapy (typical):
Device management long-term:
Vaccinations:
Communication and flagging:
Patient and family education:
Solid White Background
Follow-Up, Monitoring, and Rehabilitation

Daily: vital signs, exam for source, fluid balance, glucose, CBC, BMP, LFTs

48–72h: clinical response assessment — if not improving, broaden the workup, not just the antibiotic

Q48h blood cultures until clearance for bacteremia

Therapeutic drug monitoring for polymyxins (steady-state levels), aminoglycosides (peak/trough), vancomycin if co-administered

— Watch for drug-induced AKI, hepatitis, cytopenias, QTc prolongation

— Clinical improvement + negative cultures + source control → consider step-down or oral

— No improvement at 72h → re-image, re-culture, reassess source, ID re-consult

— Repeat susceptibility if persistent bacteremia (emergent resistance)

ID clinic visit within 1–2 weeks of discharge

Weekly CBC, BMP, LFTs while on IV antibiotics

— PICC line site assessment at each visit

— Recheck cultures based on syndrome (test of cure for UTI, repeat imaging for abscess/osteo)

— PCP follow-up within 2 weeks; coordinate care plan handoff

— Post-sepsis: PT/OT evaluation; up to 60% of sepsis survivors have new functional limitations

— Pulmonary rehab post-VAP

— Nutrition: malnutrition assessment; enteral nutrition support if needed

— Cognitive screening — sepsis-associated cognitive decline common, especially in elderly

— Post-ICU PTSD, depression, anxiety affect 20–40% of survivors

— Screen at follow-up visits; refer to mental health

— Family/caregiver support

— Some institutions repeat rectal CRE screening at intervals

— Many patients remain colonized for >12 months

— Counsel on recurrence risk and when to seek care

— Time to active therapy, source control success rate, 30-day mortality, recurrence rate, C. diff incidence, AKI incidence

CCS pearl: Schedule ID follow-up at 1 week and 4 weeks, PCP at 2 weeks, labs weekly during OPAT on the discharge orders — these scheduling steps earn points and prevent readmission.

Board pearl: Post-sepsis syndrome screening (functional, cognitive, mood) at follow-up is now part of guideline-concordant care.

Inpatient monitoring during therapy:
De-escalation/escalation triggers:
Post-discharge follow-up (OPAT model):
Functional rehabilitation:
Mental health:
Long-term surveillance:
Quality metrics to track:
Solid White Background
Ethical, Legal, and Patient Safety Considerations

— CRE is reportable to state health departments in most US jurisdictions and to CDC's NHSN

— Carbapenemase mechanism reporting (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, VIM, IMP) is increasingly required

— Failure to report = public health violation; provider and institution liable

— Federal and state requirements mandate written notification to receiving facility of CRE status

— Missing this is a sentinel patient safety event — has caused outbreaks in receiving LTACHs

— Use standardized interfacility transfer form (CDC template available)

— Use of off-label combinations (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam for MBLs) — document rationale; many institutions require ID attending sign-off

Cefiderocol carries FDA caution due to CREDIBLE-CR mortality signal in some subgroups — discuss risk/benefit when alternatives exist

— Compassionate-use access for novel agents requires informed consent

— Contact precautions associated with fewer provider visits, more delirium, more depression

— Maintain communication; minimize unnecessary isolation duration

— Patients and families need clear explanation — avoid stigmatizing language ("superbug")

— CRE bacteremia in advanced age/multimorbidity has 40–50% mortality — early palliative care consult and goals-of-care conversation are ethically required

— Discuss prognosis honestly; avoid futile escalation

— Surrogate decision-making per state law if patient lacks capacity

— Reserving newer agents preserves them for those who need them — but withholding effective therapy from an individual is also unethical

— Stewardship committees should approve, not block, indicated use

— Equity: ensure access regardless of insurance/payor (drug cost can exceed $5,000/day)

— Discharge to SNF without antibiotic plan or precautions → readmission and transmission

— Verbal handoff to outpatient providers

— Medication reconciliation at every transition

— Duty to investigate clusters; cooperate with infection prevention and public health

— Notify exposed patients per state requirements

Step 3 management: When transferring a CRE-colonized patient from hospital to SNF, complete the interfacility transfer form documenting CRE status, mechanism, and precautions — this is a patient safety best-practice and legal requirement that boards reward.

Board pearl: Failing to notify the receiving facility of CRE status is a reportable patient safety event and has been cited in outbreak litigation.

Mandatory reporting:
Interfacility transfer notification:
Informed consent edge cases:
Isolation and stigma:
Goals of care:
Antimicrobial stewardship ethics:
Transition-of-care risks:
Outbreak management:
Solid White Background
High-Yield Associations and Rapid-Fire Clinical Facts

KPC — most common in US, Israel, Italy, Greece, China

NDM — Indian subcontinent, Middle East, Balkans

OXA-48-like — Turkey, North Africa, Mediterranean

VIM/IMP — Southern Europe, Asia-Pacific

— Ceftazidime-avibactam: KPC + OXA-48 (not MBLs)

— Meropenem-vaborbactam: KPC only

— Imipenem-relebactam: KPC only

— Cefiderocol: ALL (including MBLs)

— CAZ-AVI + aztreonam: ALL (including MBLs)

— Tigecycline for bacteremia or UTI (low serum/urine concentrations)

— Pip-tazo for ESBL bacteremia (MERINO inferior to meropenem)

— Ceftriaxone for AmpC inducers (Enterobacter, Serratia)

— Polymyxin monotherapy (high mortality, nephrotoxicity)

— Uncomplicated GNR bacteremia with source control: 7 days

— Intra-abdominal with source control: 4–7 days

— HAP/VAP: 7 days

— Pyelonephritis: 7–14 days depending on agent

— Resistant to any carbapenem (imipenem MIC ≥4, meropenem ≥4, doripenem ≥4, ertapenem ≥2) OR carbapenemase positive

— Rectal/perirectal swabs in high-risk admissions

— Chlorhexidine daily bathing in ICUs

— Hand hygiene with soap and water (alcohol works for CRE too, despite myths)

— Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance can emerge within 5–10 days during therapy

— KPC-3 D179Y mutation restores carbapenem susceptibility

— Always reculture if failing

— CRE bacteremia: 40–50% historically, 20–30% with new β-lactam/BLIs

— Delay in active therapy >48h doubles mortality

Board pearl: "India + bacteremia + carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae" = NDM → use cefiderocol or CAZ-AVI + aztreonam, NOT CAZ-AVI alone.

Key distinction: Vaborbactam = KPC only; Avibactam = KPC + OXA-48; Cefiderocol = everything.

Carbapenemase geography (board favorite):
Drug → mechanism coverage cheat sheet:
Don't-use list:
Duration shortcuts:
Source control mantra: "Pus + tubing + obstruction = no antibiotic wins alone"
CDC-defined CRE:
Surveillance:
Resistance facts:
Mortality numbers:
Solid White Background
Board Question Stem Patterns

— "78-year-old hospitalized in Delhi 2 months ago, now febrile with K. pneumoniae bacteremia resistant to meropenem, ertapenem, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime-avibactam. Best next step?"

— Think: NDM (MBL) → answer is cefiderocol or CAZ-AVI + aztreonam

— Septic patient from LTACH with prior CRE colonization; appropriate empiric coverage?

— Answer: CAZ-AVI (covers most US KPC and OXA-48) + source control + ID consult

— E. coli bacteremia from UTI, resistant to ceftriaxone, susceptible to meropenem; ID confirmed ESBL.

— Answer: meropenem, NOT a new β-lactam/BLI — use the simplest active drug

— CRE bacteremia on CAZ-AVI, still febrile day 4, repeat blood cultures positive.

— Best next step: search for undrained source (CT), evaluate vascular access, repeat susceptibility for emergent resistance, ID re-consult — NOT empiric drug switch

— Catheter-associated cystitis with CRE susceptible to nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and CAZ-AVI. Best choice?

— Answer: fosfomycin or nitrofurantoin — reserve newer agents for systemic infection

— Plan to transfer CRE patient to SNF. Most important next step?

— Answer: Notify the receiving SNF in writing of CRE status and required precautions

— Lab calls with CRE isolate. What next-step test guides therapy?

— Answer: Carbapenemase identification (Xpert Carba-R or mCIM/eCIM)

— Pregnant patient with CRE pyelonephritis; safest active agent?

— Answer: β-lactam (CAZ-AVI or meropenem-vaborbactam) — avoid tigecycline, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones

— CRE bacteremia from urinary source, catheter replaced, afebrile by day 3. Duration?

— Answer: 7 days total (Yahav non-inferiority)

— Confirmed KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. Public health responsibility?

— Answer: Report to state health department and infection prevention

Step 3 management: Recognize the trigger words — "international hospitalization" → NDM; "LTACH" → KPC; "Turkey/Mediterranean" → OXA-48. Mechanism determines drug.

Board pearl: When the question lists a susceptibility report, read the resistant AND susceptible columns carefully — many questions hinge on noticing that meropenem is susceptible (just ESBL) or that CAZ-AVI is resistant (likely MBL).

Pattern 1 — Returning traveler with bacteremia:
Pattern 2 — LTACH transfer:
Pattern 3 — ESBL vs CRE distractor:
Pattern 4 — Treatment failure on appropriate therapy:
Pattern 5 — Cystitis only:
Pattern 6 — Patient safety/transfer:
Pattern 7 — Mechanism testing:
Pattern 8 — Pregnancy:
Pattern 9 — Duration:
Pattern 10 — Reporting:
Solid White Background
One-Line Recap

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) require mechanism-directed therapy with newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftazidime-avibactam for KPC/OXA-48, cefiderocol or CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam for metallo-β-lactamases like NDM/VIM/IMP), aggressive source control, contact precautions, ID consultation, and public health reporting — with empiric coverage triggered by healthcare exposure, prior colonization, or international hospitalization, especially in the Indian subcontinent or Mediterranean.

Board pearl: "India + carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella + CAZ-AVI resistance" = NDM (MBL) → cefiderocol OR ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam. "LTACH + KPC" = ceftazidime-avibactam first-line.

Step 3 management: ID consult + source control + carbapenemase identification + contact precautions + reporting + transfer notification — these orders define guideline-concordant CRE care.

Mechanism = drug: KPC → CAZ-AVI, mero-vaborbactam, imi-relebactam; OXA-48 → CAZ-AVI; MBLs (NDM/VIM/IMP) → cefiderocol or CAZ-AVI + aztreonam. Vaborbactam and relebactam do NOT cover OXA-48 or MBLs.
Source control + active antibiotic within 1 hour of septic shock recognition — remove lines, drain abscesses, relieve obstruction; antibiotics alone fail when pus or devices remain.
Duration: 7 days for uncomplicated bacteremia with source control (Yahav trial); 7 days HAP/VAP; 4–7 days intra-abdominal with source control. Reserve nitrofurantoin/fosfomycin/TMP-SMX for cystitis only to preserve newer agents.
System-level musts: contact precautions, ID + pharmacy + infection prevention consults, mandatory state reporting, written notification on interfacility transfer, EHR flag for future admissions, weekly OPAT labs, and post-sepsis follow-up at 1–2 weeks with PCP and ID.
Solid White Background
bottom of page